The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6937•United States of America v. Lawrence McNeill
18-6937Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 26, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6937
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LAWRENCE MCNEILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00269-D-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: December 26, 2018
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the
United States Sentencing Guidelines. “We review a district court’s decision to grant or
deny a sentence-reduction motion under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion.” United
States v. Peters, 843 F.3d 572, 577 (4th Cir. 2016). Because our review of the record
reveals no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.