The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6973•United States of America v. Marsha King
18-6973Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6973
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARSHA KING,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1)
Submitted: November 15, 2018 Decided: November 20, 2018
Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marsha King, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marsha King appeals the district court’s order denying her motions for a new trial
based on newly discovered evidence and to admit documentary evidence, as well as the
court’s subsequent order denying as moot several related motions. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. King, No. 2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1
(E.D. Va. July 11, 2018 & July 12, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.