The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6979•Manetirony Clervrain v. Angela Dunbar
18-6979Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6979
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANGELA DUNBAR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:18-cv-01205-GJH)
Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019
Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Manetirony Clervrain, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Manetirony Clervrain appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
complaint for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal, see
Clervrain v. Dunbar, No. 8:18-cv-01205-GJH (D. Md. July 18, 2018), but we modify the
dismissal to be without prejudice. We deny Clervrain’s motions to amend, for standing,
to proceed on the record, and for judicial union. We also deny his motion for oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.