The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-6990•United States of America v. Matthew James Dury
18-6990Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6990
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MATTHEW JAMES DURY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1)
Submitted: January 22, 2019 Decided: January 28, 2019
Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew James Dury, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment
motion entitled “Motion to Question the Constitutionality of the Interstate Commerce Act
of 1887.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v, Dury, No.
1:08-cr-00016-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. July 25, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.