The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7005•United States of America v. Terrence Lovell Dickens
18-7005Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TERRENCE LOVELL DICKENS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:12-cr-00026-D-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terrence Lovell Dickens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terrence Lovell Dickens appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18
U.S.C § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to
the United States Sentencing Guidelines. “We review a district court’s decision to grant
or deny a sentence-reduction motion under § 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion.” United
States v. Peters, 843 F.3d 572, 577 (4th Cir. 2016). Because our review of the record
reveals no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.