The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7124•Wissam T. Hammoud v. BONITA MOSLEY, Warden
18-7124Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 27, 2018
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7124
WISSAM T. HAMMOUD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
BONITA MOSLEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:17-cv-02433-RMG)
Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wissam T. Hammoud, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wissam T. Hammoud appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to the Warden in Hammoud’s
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) action and the district court’s subsequent order denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Hammoud v. Mosley, No. 5:17-cv-02433-RMG (D.S.C. July 30, 2018 &
Aug. 30, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.