The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7131•Paul William Painter v. BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent; CARMEN HENDRICKS, Physician Assistant; LETITIA OWEN
18-7131Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7131
PAUL WILLIAM PAINTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent; CARMEN HENDRICKS, Physician Assistant;
LETITIA OWEN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
LYDA OWEN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:16-ct-03134-BO)
Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019
Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul William Painter, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Dale McInnes, NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough,
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Madeleine Michelle Pfefferle, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Paul William Painter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Painter v.
Perritt, No. 5:16-ct-03134-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.