The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7236•Daryll Keith Shumake v. Commonwealth of Virginia
18-7236Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 26, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7236
DARYLL KEITH SHUMAKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01170-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: March 13, 2019 Decided: March 26, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daryll Keith Shumake, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Daryll Keith Shumake seeks to appeal the district court’s orders directing him to
file an amended 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition on the court’s standardized form and
denying his motions to appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337
U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders that Shumake seeks to appeal are neither final
orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, deny the pending motions, dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction, and remand to the district court with instructions to allow Shumake another
opportunity to file the amended § 2254 petition as directed. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.