Anthony Bussie v. Psychologist Helschulp

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7249
ANTHONY BUSSIE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PSYCHOLOGIST HELSCHULP,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:18-hc-02048-FL)
Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019
Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Bussie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Bussie, a federal civil committee, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* Bussie v.
Helschulp, No. 5:18-hc-02048-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We conclude that the district court’s dismissal order is a final, appealable order.
See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24, 629-30 (4th Cir.
2015).

-- 2 of 2 --