The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7351•Gerald D. Fuller v. FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden
18-7351Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 18, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7351
GERALD D. FULLER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:18-cv-01598-PWG)
Submitted: March 8, 2019 Decided: March 18, 2019
Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Davis Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice as successive and denying his motion to
reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Fuller v. Bishop, No. 8:18-cv-01598-PWG (D. Md. June 14 & Oct. 17,
2018). We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.