The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7353•Olandio Ray Workman v. ROBERT PERRY, Investigator
18-7353Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 10, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7353
OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT PERRY, Investigator; JAMES E. HUDSON, Magistrate; WILL LEWIS,
Sheriff of Greenville County; GREENVILLE COUNTY COUNCIL;
GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:18-cv-01331-HMH)
Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Olandio Ray Workman appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Workman v. Perry,
No. 6:18-cv-01331-HMH (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.