The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7415•Bobbie Ray Edwards v. JOE COAKLEY, Warden
18-7415Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 10, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7415
BOBBIE RAY EDWARDS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JOE COAKLEY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00119-GMG)
Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobbie Ray Edwards, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bobbie Ray Edwards appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Edwards v. Coakley, No. 3:17-cv-
00119-GMG (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 7, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.