The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7432•United States of America v. Robert Patrick Hoffman, Ii
18-7432Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 17, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7432
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT PATRICK HOFFMAN, II,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:12-cr-00184-RGD-LRL-1)
Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 17, 2019
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Patrick Hoffman, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Patrick Hoffman, II, appeals the district court’s order granting in part and
denying in part his motion for return of seized property pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.
41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hoffman, No. 2:12-cr-
00184-RGD-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.