Charles Jordan v. John H. Magill; James G. Bogle; Judge Paul M. Burch

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7438
CHARLES JORDAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN H. MAGILL; JAMES G. BOGLE; JUDGE PAUL M. BURCH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge. (5:18-cv-02852-DCN)
Submitted: April 18, 2019 Decided: April 22, 2019
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Jordan appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation to dismiss, after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2012) review, Jordan’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in
the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jordan’s informal brief and
supplement thereto do not dispute the bases for the district court’s dismissal, Jordan has
forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,
370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we deny Jordan’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --