The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7474•United States of America v. Larry D. Hill, Jr.
18-7474Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7474
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LARRY D. HILL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (4:13-cr-00028-BR-1)
Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry D. Hill, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry D. Hill, Jr., appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion for
reconsideration of the order denying his motion to amend his presentence report. Hill
offered nothing in his motion for reconsideration to undermine the district court’s
conclusion that the proposed amendment does not qualify as a correction of a clerical
error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. And, contrary to his assertion on appeal, Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(a) has no application in a criminal case. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. United States v. Hill, No. 4:13-cr-00028-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.