The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-7479•United States of America v. Kenneth Mantrell Nesmith, a/k/a K-Wayne
18-7479Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7479
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH MANTRELL NESMITH, a/k/a K-Wayne,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:13-cr-00843-RBH-6)
Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Mantrell Nesmith, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Dolan Taylor, Assistant
United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Mantrell Nesmith appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se
motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Nesmith, No.
4:13-cr-00843-RBH-6 (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.