The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1033•In re: James William Paul Sanderson
19-1033Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1033
In re: JAMES WILLIAM PAUL SANDERSON,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(7:10-cr-00144-D-1; 7:17-cv-00196-D)
Submitted: March 14, 2019 Decided: March 19, 2019
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James William Paul Sanderson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James William Paul Sanderson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He
seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record
reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.