The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1036•Phillip O’briant v. Mayor
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1036
PHILLIP O’BRIANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY; CATHERINE PUGH,
Mayor; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; DONALD BURNS, OFC;
RUSSELL MERRITT, OFC; JOY PHILLIPS, Assistant Public Defender; JAN
ALEXANDER, Assistant State’s Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:18-cv-02614-GLR)
Submitted: May 1, 2019 Decided: May 3, 2019
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip O’Briant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip O’Briant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See O’Briant v. Mayor of Balt. City, No. 1:18-cv-02614-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 28,
2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.