The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1112•Phillip O’briant v. Jayne Miller
19-1112Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1112
PHILLIP O’BRIANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAYNE MILLER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:18-cv-03252-GLR)
Submitted: March 22, 2019 Decided: March 27, 2019
Before MOTZ, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip O’Briant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Phillip O’Briant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See O’Briant v.
Miller, No. 1:18-cv-03252-GLR (D. Md. filed Oct. 26, 2018; entered Oct. 29, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.