The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1201•Michael G. Capps v. Oconee County Sheriff’s Office
19-1201Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1201
MICHAEL G. CAPPS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; MIKE CRENSHAW; KEVIN DAVIS;
JEFF UNDERWOOD; BRIAN LONG; JUSTIN PELFREY; JOSH LABRECQUE;
THE SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE RESERVE FUND; CHRIS
LOMBARD; ANN MACON SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Kevin Frank McDonald, Magistrate Judge. (8:18-cv-01434-DCC)
Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 28, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael G. Capps, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael G. Capps seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report recommending
that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted and his motions for summary
judgment be denied in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final district court orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and
certain interlocutory and collateral district court orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R.
Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949).
The report Capps seeks to appeal is neither a final district court order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral district court order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.