The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1206•In re: Richelle D. Wallace
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1206
In re: RICHELLE D. WALLACE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:15-cv-00126-AWA-LRL)
Submitted: July 30, 2019 Decided: August 20, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richelle D. Wallace, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richelle D. Wallace petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in ruling on the appropriate amount of attorney’s fees in her civil case.
She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present
record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.