The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1208•Susan E. Pattishall v. Vinton G. Cerf, computer scientist (retired)
19-1208Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1208
SUSAN E. PATTISHALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VINTON G. CERF, computer scientist (retired); ROBERT E. KAHN, computer
scientist (retired),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01396-LO-MSN)
Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 30, 2019
Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Susan E. Pattishall, Appellant Pro Se. James Paul Menzies Miller, ODIN, FELDMAN &
PITTLEMAN, PC, Reston, Virginia; Jonathan Michael Baker, CROWELL & MORING
LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Susan E. Pattishall appeals the district court’s order dismissing her conversion
action as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Pattishall v. Cerf, No. 1:18-cv-01396-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 22, 2019 & entered
Feb. 25, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.