The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1247•Lawrence Mills v. Suntrust Banks, Inc.
19-1247Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 18, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1247
LAWRENCE MILLS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:18-cv-00743-GJH)
Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 18, 2019
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Zinsner, TROUTMAN
SANDERS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Mills appeals the district court’s order dismissing his suit against
SunTrust Banks, Inc., because res judicata barred Mills’ claims. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Mills v. SunTrust Banks, Inc., No. 8:18-cv-00743-GJH (D. Md. Mar. 4,
2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.