The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1269•William Lee Grant, Ii v. U.s. Department of Defense
19-1269Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 22, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1269
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00369-REP)
Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019
Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Grant, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Grant, II, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint
as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his motion to amend his
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v.
U.S. Dep’t of Defense, No. 3:18-cv-00369-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2019). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.