In re: Gabrielle Myers, a/k/a Gabby Myers

19-1286Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 22, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1286
In re: GABRIELLE MYERS, a/k/a Gabby Myers,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:17-cr-00688-JFA-13)
Submitted: May 14, 2019 Decided: May 22, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gabrielle Myers, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Gabrielle Myers petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order modifying the
district court’s discovery order in her pending criminal case. We conclude that Myers is
not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Mandamus relief is available only
when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907
F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Finally, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for
appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007).
The relief sought by Myers is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of
mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.