In re: Kareem Jamal Currence

19-1399Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 17, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1399
In re: KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:05-cr-00231-MLH-1)
Submitted: June 13, 2019 Decided: June 17, 2019
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem Jamal Currence, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kareem Jamal Currence has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging the
district court has unduly delayed acting on several motions Currence filed in his criminal
matter, and he seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act on the
motions. The present record reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.