The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1429•Aaron D. Rainney Chidubem v. U. S. Postal Service; Megan J. Brennan
19-1429Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 22, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1429
AARON D. RAINNEY CHIDUBEM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE; MEGAN J. BRENNAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:18-cv-00517-MHL)
Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019
Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron D. Rainney Chidubem, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Aaron D. Rainney Chidubem appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his suit against the Appellees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to
prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chidubem v. U.S. Postal Serv., No.
3:18-cv-00517-MHL (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.