Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr. v. the State of North Carolina

19-1538Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1538
TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; DAVID R. SHEARON; SARDIA MARIE
HANKINS; TRUCPHUONG NGUYEN; ANGUS NGUYEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00061-D)
Submitted: August 22, 2019 Decided: August 26, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Omar Hankins, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion
to reopen his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action and denying his request for mandamus
relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Hankins v. North Carolina, No. 7:18-cv-
00061-D (E.D.N.C. May 10, 2019). We deny Hankins’ motion to recuse any judge who
has been admitted to the North Carolina bar. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.