The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1650•Denise Gibbon v. Andrew Saul, in his official capacity of Commissioner of Social Security
19-1650Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 24, 2021
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1650
DENISE GIBBON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANDREW SAUL, in his official capacity of Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-cv-00402-D)
Submitted: January 28, 2021 Decided: February 24, 2021
Before FLOYD, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Denise Gibbon, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Denise Gibbon appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Gibbon’s
request to withdraw her application for early retirement benefits. We have reviewed the
record and the parties’ supplemental briefs, and we perceive no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and judgment. See Gibbon v. Saul,
No. 5:17-cv-00402-D (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.