The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1800•In re: Michael Kenny Carter, a/k/a Blaze
19-1800Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1800
In re: MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:17-cr-00351-JMC-1; 3:18-cv-02707-JMC)
Submitted: January 28, 2020 Decided: February 26, 2020
Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Kenny Carter, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Kenny Carter has filed a petition and supplemental petitions for a writ of
mandamus alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2018) motion and on pending motions in that proceeding. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act on his § 2255 motion and on the pending
motions. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied
Carter’s § 2255 motion on January 6, 2020, and has acted on the pending motions in that
proceeding. Accordingly, because Carter has obtained the relief he sought, we deny the
petition and supplemental petitions for a writ of mandamus as moot. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.