The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-2038•KEVIN C. BETSKOFF, On behalf of himself v. DIANE S. ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC; DIANE S. ROSENBERG, Esquire
19-2038Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 12, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2038
KEVIN C. BETSKOFF, On behalf of himself,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DIANE S. ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC; DIANE S. ROSENBERG,
Esquire,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:18-cv-02133-PWG)
Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 12, 2020
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin C. Betskoff, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin C. Betskoff, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
on the grounds of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Betskoff v. Rosenberg
& Assocs., No. 8:18-cv-02133-PWG (D. Md. Aug. 16, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.