Jamaal Gittens v. Equifax

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2340
JAMAAL GITTENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EQUIFAX,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
TRANSUNION,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00228-FDW-DSC)
Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 20, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN, Circuit Judge. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
* The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2018).

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Jamaal Gittens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jamaal Gittens appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his lawsuit against
Equifax without prejudice for insufficient service of process. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Gittens v. Equifax, No. 3:16-cv-00228-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --