The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-2422•Richard Gravely v. Anthony Majestro; Marvin W. Masters; Benjamin L. Bailey
19-2422Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2422
RICHARD GRAVELY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY MAJESTRO; MARVIN W. MASTERS; BENJAMIN L. BAILEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00192)
Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 16, 2020
Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Gravely, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on Gravely’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Gravely v. Majestro, No. 3:19-cv-00192 (S.D.W. Va.
Dec. 10, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.