The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-6026•William Carawan, Jr. v. George Solomon; Brad Perritt; George W. Baysden, Jr.; Marcus Hovis; Officer Norris
19-6026Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 21, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6026
WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEORGE SOLOMON; BRAD PERRITT; GEORGE W. BAYSDEN, JR.;
MARCUS HOVIS; OFFICER NORRIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03269-FL)
Submitted: May 17, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019
Before WILKINSON, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Carawan, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Carawan, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
contempt. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carawan v. Solomon, No.
5:16-ct-03269-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2018). Carawan’s claim must be pursued in an
independent action and is not cognizable in the current proceeding. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.