The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-6034•Frank Stephon Johnson v. Correct Care Solutions
19-6034Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 10, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6034
FRANK STEPHON JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS; MRS. M. GASKINS, Administer Nurse;
DIRECTOR DR. RANDOLPH; RN SHANNON; MRS. NURSE MCLEAN;
NURSE MELISSA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MRS. PARKER, Nurse,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:18-cv-00876-HMH)
Submitted: April 4, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Frank Stephon Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Victor Gende, Ryan Joseph Patane,
SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Frank Stephon Johnson appeals the district court’s order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil
action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Correct Care Sols., No. 0:18-cv-00876-HMH (D.S.C. Dec. 19, 2018).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.