The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-6085•Olandio Ray Workman v. Metro Pcs Mobile Phone Company
19-6085Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6085
OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
METRO PCS MOBILE PHONE COMPANY; MR. RICHARDSON; MR. LEWIS,
Greenville County Sheriff’s Office; GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (6:17-cv-01208-RBH)
Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 29, 2019
Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Olandio Ray Workman appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Workman’s motions to amend and to stay the appeal and we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Workman v. Metro PCS Mobile Phone
Co., No. 6:17-cv-01208-RBH (D.S.C. July 17, 2018 & Dec. 27, 2018). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.