The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-6112•Anthony Newman v. Andrew Moultrie, M.d.; Oladipo Olaleye, Rpn; Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
19-6112Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 23, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6112
ANTHONY NEWMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANDREW MOULTRIE, M.D.; OLADIPO OLALEYE, RPN; WEXFORD
HEALTH SOURCES, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:18-cv-00457-TDC)
Submitted: April 18, 2019 Decided: April 23, 2019
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Newman, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas William Chrencik, GOODELL DEVRIES
LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Newman appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action alleging deliberate indifference to
his serious medical needs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Newman v. Moultrie,
No. 8:18-cv-00457-TDC (D. Md. Dec. 18, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.