The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-6142•James Pitts v. Dolph Druckman; Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
19-6142Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 24, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6142
JAMES PITTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOLPH DRUCKMAN; WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-03456-PWG)
Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 24, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Pitt, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS,
RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale Park, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Pitts appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pitts v. Druckman,
No. 8:17-cv-03456-PWG (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2019). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.