The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-6185•David Meyers v. U.s. Attorney General
19-6185Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 31, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6185
DAVID MEYERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 19-6192
DAVID MEYERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; VIRGINIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:17-cv-00167-GEC-PMS; 7:17-cv-00075-
GEC-PMS)
Submitted: July 11, 2019 Decided: July 31, 2019
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Meyers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, David Meyers appeals the district court’s orders
denying his postjudgment motions to seal. We have reviewed the record and find no
abuse of discretion. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599
(1978) (stating standard of review); In re Application & Affidavit for a Search Warrant,
923 F.2d 324, 326 (4th Cir. 1991) (same). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.