Clarence Duke Reynolds v. State of Virginia

19-6311Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 21, 2019

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6311
CLARENCE DUKE REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF VIRGINIA; ADRIANNE BENNETT, Chairwoman of Parole Board;
REVERAND A. LINCOLN JAMES, Member of Parole Board; SHERMAN LEA,
Member of Parole Board; JEAN W. CUNNINGHAM, Member of Parole Board;
JONI L. IVEY, Member of Parole Board; RALPH S. NORTHAM, Governor,
State of Virginia; THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE OF
VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TERRY MCAULIFFE, Former Governor; State of Virginia; PAROLE BOARD
MEMBERS; GOVERNOR,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:17-cv-00517-JLK-JCH)
Submitted: May 16, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Clarence Duke Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Duke Reynolds appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v.
Virginia, No. 7:17-cv-00517-JLK-JCH (W.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2019). We deny Reynolds’
motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.