Willie Johnson v. BRYAN P. STIRLING, SCDC Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections

19-6657Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2021

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6657
WILLIE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN P. STIRLING, SCDC Director of South Carolina Department of
Corrections; WEST PRICE; SERGEANT A. HUDSON; SERGEANT STORY;
SERGEANT WRIGHT,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 19-7791
WILLIE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRYAN P. STIRLING, SCDC Director of South Carolina Department of
Corrections; WEST PRICE; EMILY A. FARR; ELIZABETH SIMMONS; DR.
STACY SMITH; DR. RICK TOOMEY, Director of DHEC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Beaufort. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:18-cv-03028-RMG-BM)

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Submitted: November 23, 2021 Decided: November 29, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Kenneth Paul
Woodington, DAVIDSON, WREN & DEMASTERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Willie Johnson appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on Johnson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Stirling, No. 9:18-cv-03028-RMG-BM
(D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2019 & Apr. 2, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.