United States of America v. Troy Douglas Baylor

19-7101Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2021

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7101
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TROY DOUGLAS BAYLOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:11-cr-00064-MHL-2; 3:16-cv-00505-
MHL)
Submitted: November 12, 2021 Decided: November 17, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Douglas Baylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Troy Douglas Baylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge
issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of
appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a
prisoner satisfies this standard by showing that reasonable jurists could find the district
court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137
S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must show both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the
motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler,
565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Baylor has not made
the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal.∗ We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
∗ To the extent that Baylor seeks compassionate release or other relief under the
First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, he may file a motion for such
relief in the district court. We express no opinion as to the merits of any such motion.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.