The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7289•Rex I. Hatfield; Everly K. Hatfield v. D. L. YOUNG, Warden
19-7289Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7289
REX I. HATFIELD; EVERLY K. HATFIELD,
Petitioners - Appellants,
v.
D. L. YOUNG, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:18-cv-01265)
Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rex I. Hatfield, Everly K. Hatfield, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rex I. Hatfield and Everly K. Hatfield, federal prisoners, appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their
joint 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hatfield v. Young, No. 5:18-cv-01265 (S.D.W. Va.
Sept. 3, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.