The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7448•United States of America v. Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr.
19-7448Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 2, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7448
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FREDERICK GASTON BROWN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00149-RGD-3)
Submitted: March 31, 2020 Decided: April 2, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Gaston Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(B) (2018) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown,
No. 2:90-cr-00149-RGD-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 2019). We deny Brown’s motion to appoint
counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.