The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7460•Blake Sandlain v. BARBARA RICKARD, Warden
19-7460Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 20, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7460
BLAKE SANDLAIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
BARBARA RICKARD, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00025-DAF)
Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 20, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Blake Sandlain, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Blake Sandlain, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying his motion for injunctive relief, and
denying relief on Sandlain’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Sandlain v. Rickard, No. 1:19-cv-00025-DAF (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 2019).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.