The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7469•United States of America v. Loreze J. Williams, a/k/a Rez
19-7469Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7469
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LOREZE J. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Rez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cr-00825-CMC-15)
Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: February 25, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Loreze J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Loreze J. Williams appeals the district court’s order and amended criminal judgment
granting Williams’ motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Section 404(b) of the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Williams, No. 3:09-cr-00825-CMC-15 (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 2019). We deny
Williams’ motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.