The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7548•Katrina R. Ben v. Christopher Moskal; Shane Scott; Darren M. Popkin
19-7548Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 20, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7548
KATRINA R. BEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER MOSKAL; SHANE SCOTT; DARREN M. POPKIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:17-cv-03054-DKC)
Submitted: April 16, 2020 Decided: April 20, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Katrina R. Ben, Appellant Pro Se. Kirstin Michele Lustila, Assistant Attorney General,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Katrina R. Ben appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary
judgment on Ben’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ben v. Moskal, No. 8:17-cv-03054-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 12, 2019). We deny as moot Ben’s
motion to compel the production of a prison trust account statement. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.