The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7598•Robert L. Hedrick v. United States Marshal’s Service
19-7598Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7598
ROBERT L. HEDRICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES MARSHAL’S SERVICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00532-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: July 24, 2020 Decided: July 29, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Hedrick, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert L. Hedrick appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment
motion filed in his closed civil case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hedrick v.
U.S. Marshal’s Serv., No. 1:15-cv-00532-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 3, 2019; entered
Sept. 4, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.