The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7839•United States of America v. Marilyn Kirkland
19-7839Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7839
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARILYN KIRKLAND,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:17-cr-01022-JFA-1)
Submitted: February 18, 2020 Decided: February 21, 2020
Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marilyn Kirkland, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marilyn Kirkland appeals the district court’s order denying her motion pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3664(k) (2018) to adjust her restitution payment schedule due to an economic
change in circumstances. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Kirkland, No. 3:17-cr-01022-JFA-1 (Nov. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.