The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-7893•Anthony Leon Latimer, a/k/a Gerrald Smith v. Ben Jones; Daniel Dwyer; Michele F. Hansen
19-7893Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 21, 2020
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7893
ANTHONY LEON LATIMER, a/k/a Gerrald Smith,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BEN JONES; DANIEL DWYER; MICHELE F. HANSEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:18-cv-02243-PX)
Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: May 21, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Leon Latimer, Appellant Pro Se. Michele J. McDonald, Assistant Attorney
General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leon Latimer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2018) complaint as to Defendants Daniel Dwyer and Michele F. Hansen and
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Ben Jones. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Latimer v. Jones, No. 8:18-cv-02243-PX (D. Md. May 16, 2019). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.